Why Pakistan's Year of Children Hits Harder Than It Sounds
I keep coming back to one line from Archbishop Joseph Arshad. Not the statistics, grim as they are. Not even his call for swift justice. The line that stays with me is simpler, sharper: child safety is not just a family matter, but a national moral responsibility.
That is exactly right. It is also the sort of sentence people nod at too quickly, as if agreement were the same thing as obedience.
The report he referenced, from the Pakistani NGO Sahil, says reported child abuse cases rose by 8 percent in 2025, with 3,630 confirmed cases of violence, more than nine children abused each day. Abduction and rape were identified as the most common crimes. Girls made up 53 percent of victims, and children aged 11 to 15 were the most vulnerable.
Those numbers are awful on their own. Still, I've learned over the years that statistics can create a strange distance. We read them and feel properly saddened, then we move on to lunch or email or whatever small domestic emergency is next. Numbers matter. They also let us hide.
When the obvious has to be said out loud
What Archbishop Arshad did here was not dramatic. He did something harder than dramatic. He said the obvious thing plainly in a culture where obvious things are often avoided until they become unbearable.
He called crimes against children shameful violations of human dignity. He urged the government, law enforcement, and child protection institutions to take immediate and transparent action. He rejected silence, negligence, and failure to enforce the law. That sounds basic because it is basic. Basic moral truths become radical only after a society gets used to stepping around them.
The Church knows something about this bitterly well. I don't say that lightly.
Whenever bishops speak about protecting children, there is an unavoidable layer beneath every sentence now. Our own history has stripped away any right to vague moralism. So when I hear an archbishop insist that suspected abuse must be reported to competent authorities, I don't hear a generic statement. I hear a standard the Church must accept first for herself and then ask of everyone else.
That's why this struck me as more than ceremonial language from Vatican News copy. In Islamabad-Rawalpindi, the Catholic community has dedicated 2026 as a "Year of Children." Fine, someone might say, another church year with banners and themes and perhaps a logo nobody will remember by Lent. Fair enough. I've seen enough parish theme years to earn at least a little cynicism. We once had boxes of leftover pamphlets in a storage closet so long they started curling like autumn leaves.
Still... sometimes setting aside a year matters because it forces repetition. Repetition can become culture if people mean it.
The danger isn't only evil, it's silence
Archbishop Arshad appealed not only to parents and teachers but also to religious leaders, media, civil society, and all citizens. I was glad to see that breadth. Abuse survives inside closed systems where everybody assumes somebody else is responsible.
Families matter enormously, of course they do. Parents need trust with their children, vigilance, honest conversations about personal safety. He said that directly. But families alone cannot bear what institutions refuse to confront.
I've sat with adults who carried old wounds from childhood for years because they thought no one would believe them or because speaking would bring shame onto the family instead of judgment onto the abuser where it belongs. Shame is one of hell's favorite tools. It doesn't only punish victims after the fact. It prepares the ground before the crime by making disclosure feel dangerous.
This is why his rejection of silence and stigma matters so much. Not as slogan. As practice.
Report suspected abuse. Cooperate with competent authorities. Demand transparency instead of private reassurances whispered in hallways after Mass or over tea after school meetings or in those little circles where everyone knows something is wrong but no one wants to be "the one" who says it first.
I've seen that instinct in church life more times than I'd like to admit. People tell themselves they're preserving peace when they're often preserving comfort.
A test bigger than one country
There is also something quietly beautiful in his final appeal for people of every religion to work together for children's well-being. Pakistan's Catholics are a minority community, which means this appeal carries both humility and courage. It does not retreat into sectarian language. It reaches outward.
That matters because predators do not care about our religious labels or our institutional boundaries. They look for access, secrecy, vulnerability, fear. The response has to be wider than one diocese or one government office or one pious campaign month.
And if I'm honest, this story bothered me in a useful way because it exposes how often Christians speak eloquently about children in the abstract while neglecting the boring parts of protection in real life: reporting structures, training, accountability, listening without panic or denial, checking whether our schools and parishes are actually safe rather than merely respectable.
Respectability can be a disguise. Sometimes an excellent one.
I think of Jesus placing a child in the midst of adults who were busy sorting out importance and status and rank. He had a habit of doing that, putting the vulnerable at the center where grown people could no longer pretend their arguments were harmless abstractions.
Maybe that's what Archbishop Arshad is trying to do with this Year of Children in his diocese: place the child back in the middle of public life where excuses start to sound thin.
I hope people listen. More than that, I hope they get concrete fast.
Because every society says children matter. The truer test is what happens after someone whispers that a particular child may not be safe.
Source: Pakistani Archbishop renews Church's appeal to protect children from abuse
Chat with Henry S. Wallace
Have a question about this article?





